Skip to main content
Exclusives, equatives and prosodic phrases in Samoan

Abstract

This paper investigates the functions of prosodic phrasing in the Austronesian VSO language Samoan. Two types of sentences are investigated, exclusives (involving the particle na’o ‘only’) and equatives. Two complementary methodologies were used, a production study and an acceptability judgment study, to examine the prosodic realisation and relative naturalness of different word orderings of the two sentence types. The particle na’o has an unusual distribution: preceding the initial constituent, be it the verb or a fronted noun phrase; or following the verb, but only modifying the absolutive (object). It was found that post-verbal absolutives modified by na’o are usually not preceded by a phrase boundary, unlike unmodified absolutives which are consistently preceded by a high phrase tone (H-) (cf. Yu 2009). Equatives in Samoan involve clauses which are the juxtaposition of two noun phrases, one the rheme (focus) and the other the theme (topic). It was found that rhemes are usually followed by a phrase break, while for themes this is optional. Rheme-theme order was strongly preferred to theme-rheme order. These findings are argued to show a close relationship between information structure, constituent ordering and prosodic phrasing in Samoan. The preferred order of constituents in Samoan is rheme-theme, with a high phrase tone marking the end of the rheme. The absolutive argument is strongly preferred to be at the start of the theme. 

This article is part of the Special Collection: Prosody and constituent structure

Keywords

Samoan, Austronesian languages, prosody, information structure, production ­experiment, acceptability judgments

How to Cite

Calhoun, S., (2017) “Exclusives, equatives and prosodic phrases in Samoan”, Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 2(1): 11. doi: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.196

Downloads

Download PDF

1104

Views

498

Downloads

7

Citations

Share

Authors

Sasha Calhoun orcid logo (Victoria University of Wellington)

Downloads

Issues

Publication details

Licence

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0

Identifiers

Peer Review

This article has been peer reviewed.

File Checksums (MD5)

  • PDF: a2961f48336de706419cf6d58ddeb550